Snark is condescension after two bong hits and a half bag of Oreos. The irony of the rest is too perfect to touch.
I enjoy our discussions up to the point that you use it as a tool to criticize me personally, or my style of thinking, instead of talking about the subject. I think we are looking for very different things from our exchanges. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > Condescension is not kindness. > > That wasn't condescension, it was snark. > > In response to pomposity. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > Curtis, Marek has made my points more > > > authoritatively and far more succinctly than > > > I've been able to do, so I'll bow out, except > > > for this: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > Your thinking is so very rigid when it suits > > > > > > your purposes, and so very flexible when that > > > > > > works better for you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed. It has taken me years of self development > > > > > > to achieve this. > > > > > > > > > > Judy: And you're *proud* of insisting on the evidence > > > > > when it confirms your beliefs and ignoring it > > > > > when it doesn't?? > > > > > > > > > > Me: I don't see how trying to characterize my thinking > > > > > process in a negative way advances our discussion Judy. > > > > > I am not soliciting your help in my general thinking > > > > > style. > > > > > > You weren't soliciting my help in understanding > > > Guru Dev and MMY either. > > > > > > Why would you be soliciting help anyway if you > > > aren't aware you need it? > > > > > > Just think of it as a random act of kindness. >
