Did you get my message about staff styles? They give a much easier solution than editing optimises staff names.
Christopher At 10:28 PM -0300 7/12/02, M. Perticone wrote: >thanks mr. bailey. i'm currently doing it as you suggest. but somehow i >thought there would be a better way, less in a work-around manner. >thanks again, >marcelo > >----- Original Message ----- >From: David H. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: M. Perticone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:41 PM >Subject: Re: [Finale] orchestral efficiency - more > > >> Once the part is optimized, you can edit the staff name for individual >> staves and not affect the others. Or is that group names? I can't >> remember, but you will be able to change the labels so they are correct. >> >> >> >> >> M. Perticone wrote: >> >> > hello list, >> > >> > i need to solve something closely related to this thread. >> > >> > i would put two parts in a single staff, say, flutes I/II. but some >passages >> > are too way polyphonic and complex, so sharing the same staff would >result >> > in a messy layout. i know i can write those parts in two different >staves, >> > and at last, optimizing would hide the the non-used staff. but as you >can >> > see, i would have to accomodate those parts in a single page, and a >problem >> > with staves names remains, as the first staff will say flutes I - II, >and >> > the other one, flute II. is there a better choice or procedure? >> > thanks in advance for any advice, >> > >> > regards, > > > marcelo _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
