For those of you dedicated to using Mac OS X, I can see that having
all your applications written for the OS is a big thing.
My weekend experience with Jaguar (OS 10.2.3) is extremely
disappointing, however. I got OS X running on my G4 533 MHz machine
and was impressed by some of the software written by Apple just for
that system. Overall, I find the system is slower than 9.2.2 and with
less functionality. (Functionality will improve over time, I'm sure.)
OS X is gimmicky and bloated and will require me to get a much faster
computer to use it at the level I currently use. Finale with MIDI is
still hopeless as is Digital Performer. Even my SCSI CD burner had to
be disconnected.
The worst part of the experience was trying to switch back to my
9.2.2 system partition. It took me a day and a half just to get it
running again. In the end I had to backup,reinitialize my hard drive
and restore all of my software. I realize that your results will
probably vary and that OS X is the future of Macs, but right now the
speed hit, and size of the system itself make OS X a worse option
than system 9.
I might be in the minority, but I would rather see bug fixes and
feature improvements in Finale rather than an OS X version.
Will we be forced to switch to OS X to be able to use future versions
of Finale? Or will there be 2 versions?
-Randolph Peters
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Randolph Peters
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Darcy James Argue
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Randolph Peters
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Darcy James Argue
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait dfenton
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Matthew Hindson
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Johannes Gebauer
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Darcy James Argue
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Christopher BJ Smith
- Re: [Finale] TAN: Mac OS X can wait Carlberg Jones