> Well, first and foremost I'd like to see the capability of linebreaks; if > the mechanism were introduced it's certainly feasible to create two > expressions, one without embedded CR-LF's, and the other one with, and use > the appropriate one at each point. However, as I like to think > of myself as > a frugal individual, if a switch can be set so that these are ignored in > some places, but not in others, then one can get by with one expression > instead of two. > > ns
Yes, but at the expense of an unfrugal and excessive case of feature-itis. I'll take CR's in expressions, thank you very much. But the special case you mention is too obscure to have a feature dedicated to it, when it can be handled quite easily (and, IMO, more cleanly) by defining two different expressions. -Lee _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
