In the particular case I am working on, the original score was prepared in Cubase, that probably does not have all the range of articulations that Finale provides.
Since Sfp comes in the Maestro font I thought it was more common than Sfzp... Thanks to all for the answers. ˇDe vuelta al trabajo! Javier. > Thanks for posting my previous email correctly...apologies... > > 'sfz subito p' is a more sudden descent to piano than 'sfzp', as > indicated by the extra word. 'sfzp' is a more sudden attack than 'sfp', > or at least that's how I've always interpreted it. But my main point is > not how each one should be interpreted, but that there _should_ be an > audible difference between each when performed, however the player > chooses to realise that (and that will obviously depend on the instrument). > > Re. engraving - if I wasn't sure whether the different uses of the terms > was intended, I'd ask the composer/arranger if they were, and if not > whether they should be standardised. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
