So big business is now dictating feature reductions? Stupid. There should have been a compromise or something. If you have more than 4 staff lists only the first 4 can support the new measure expressions. After that, it would be like previous versions. Something like that would have been a better way to deal with it......at least for people who have been using the feature a lot.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Tyler Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- On Wed, 7/30/08, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Absent a true programming need, there is no logical reason > > for such a limitation because any such change in the number > > > > of staff lists would have involved programming time which > > would better have been spent elsewhere. > > > > > I don't think that would be the case. Given the new design, I think it's a > good bet they had to redo a bunch of the staff list functionality anyway, > and if anything, it would probably have been extra programming effort to > allow for the ability to create staff lists in the new system. Regardless, I > don't think that's the reason it's not in there. I think the reason it's not > in there is related to publishers complaining about receiving user files > that had terribly indiscriminate use of staff lists which translated into > more work for them. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
