Re: [Finale] Some comments re Fin09

[Tyler Turner]

--- On Fri, 8/1/08, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> I appreciate that link -- however I still see no reason
> that 
> a publisher has been crippled by the different numbers of 
> staff lists submission may have.

Scott addressed this. In essence, having the more solid convention for when and 
where staff lists are used makes it more likely that publishers will be able to 
predict where staff lists are in place and makes it more likely they will be 
able to apply global or individual changes that do what they want without 
subtle gotchas.

Having 50 different expression categories for dynamics so that they could each 
have a different staff list would slow those publishers down. Having any staff 
list at all for dynamics would make them unpredictable when positioning or 
deleting, and would thus also slow them down.


      
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale