Re: [Finale] Some comments re Fin09

[Tyler Turner]

--- On Wed, 7/30/08, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Absent a true programming need, there is no logical reason 
> for such a limitation because any such change in the number
> 
> of staff lists would have involved programming time which 
> would better have been spent elsewhere.
> 


I don't think that would be the case. Given the new design, I think it's a good 
bet they had to redo a bunch of the staff list functionality anyway, and if 
anything, it would probably have been extra programming effort to allow for the 
ability to create staff lists in the new system. Regardless, I don't think 
that's the reason it's not in there. I think the reason it's not in there is 
related to publishers complaining about receiving user files that had terribly 
indiscriminate use of staff lists which translated into more work for them.


      
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale