On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 08:29 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
I agree with you, Bill. I am trying to satisfy the other people. :) I think "don't do that, idiot" is sufficient.On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 11:22 US/Eastern, Ben Hines wrote:Why is everyone hung up on MOVING the stupid apps???? Fink does *not* need to support moving of the apps. If the user wants to 'move' the apps, they can create copies or links. Done deal.On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 08:03 AM, Jared wrote:Using aliases is not Mac-like. Giving users the illusion of moving their apps isn't good enough. Besides, at this point, anyone using Fink isn't going to be stopped by having the item in a hidden directory. (Right-click > Show Original ends that search).Using "shortcuts" is not mac-like. Aliases are much more powerful and were invented by Apple, couldnt get more mac-like. :)
If we want to support moving apps, we have no choice. Fink is based on dpkg which requires its files stay in one place.
-Ben
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
