On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 09:53 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:

Read the post. I didn't say that Apps installed by Fink should be in
/Applications. They should be in /sw/Applications, to further follow the Fink
guidelines. They work fine there.
Right, they work fine everywhere. What would stop a user from moving it out of /sw/Applications? In fact, I would expect users to go "I want all of my apps in one place", and move them into /Applications, first thing they do...

Exactly as it would in any properly administrated network computing environment.
The Applications directory that Fink installes into would be owned by root or
otherwise non-writable by the user. That /Applications is writable by a
'normal' OS X user is a bug, IMO.
I don't think it's necessarily a bug, it's just a historical difference in the way user control is treated between mac and unix. It's not like they made it user-modifiable by accident. Application bundles are made to be movable. That's why they're built that way.

I said nothing about projects that require themselves to be installed in a
particular location.
Your original post had implied that a (possibly mobile) .app bundle is the same thing as a regular command-line binary /sw/bin/python, so I assumed you meant .app bundles that somehow were not allowed to move because they depended on some specific path info.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Reply via email to