Viv Kendon wrote:
[]
> Note: I have xorg installed on this machine:
>   i   system-pkgconfi  1.4.0.90-1   [virtual pkgconfig 
> package representing x...
> *i*  xorg             6.8.2-1044   Free X11 implementation
> *i*  xorg-shlibs      6.8.2-1044   Free X11 implementation
> 
> but no info files for it (because it was installed before 
> they disappeared from the 10.5 version of the tree I think).
> I also have the Leopard X11, probably 2.1.4, with the X11R6 
> simlink removed so they can coexist.

If there is a safe recipe for disaster, then this is it.

If you compile anything with this constellation, you have no way of 
knowing which one of the two incompatible X11s will be used; most 
probably a deadly mixture of both. Packages may well choose to use your 
include files from /usr/X11R6 together with the libraries from /usr/X11.

And if you run X11, do you know in every situation which one of the two 
executables of the same name will be executed?

fink itself is confused, too, because for determining what version of 
X11 you have, it looks for *.pc files in both /usr/X11 and /usr/X11R6 
and gets two different answers. (The fact that it looks in both might be 
considered a bug, but it works under normal circumstances.)

As for the fontconfig problem: The "*i*" is there because you have a 
package installed that doesn't exist (in this version or at all) for 
10.5. I would remove the fontconfig-config, perhaps using dpkg

  sudo dpkg -r --purge fontconfig-config

(you tried to remove "fontconfig-config", didn't you, not 
"fontconfig-conf"?)

-- 
Martin




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to