{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 11:58 AM, Colter Reed wrote:
> {#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {#} To reply to the author, write to Colter Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 4/12/02 09:02, "Martin H�cker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now I don't think that it would be a good Idee to implant support for
>> this in Fire, as it would _really_ clutter the interface, but I also
>> think that always asking the remote part for his IP can be very
>> anoying, especially if the counterpart does not now how to get it.
>> (Yes I could explain it everytime, but its no fun)
>
> Yeah, but that's something that everybody should know how to do.
>
>> Therefore I think that there should be a way to get that information,
>> but it could be very well hidden, as it is really not needed most of
>> the time.
>
> I'd shy away from it. Things that only work on one service like that
> generate lots of extraneous bug reports ("Fire doesn't show 'user is
> typing'
> notifications for AIM buddies") and impossible feature requests ("I
> want to
> set my status to 'Eating a very large cheeseburger in paradise' on
> ICQ").
> It's a headache for us, confuses users, and lends falsely to the
> impression
> that Fire is half-baked.
>
> Colter
> Lead Fire Developer
>
>
> {#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
>
>
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
