{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4cker?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Now I don't think that it would be a good Idee to implant support for
>> this in Fire, as it would _really_ clutter the interface, but I also
>> think that always asking the remote part for his IP can be very
>> anoying, especially if the counterpart does not now how to get it.
>> (Yes I could explain it everytime, but its no fun)
>
>Yeah, but that's something that everybody should know how to do.
<lol> Don't you get loads of e-mail asking for such simple things?
> > Therefore I think that there should be a way to get that information,
>> but it could be very well hidden, as it is really not needed most of
>> the time.
>
>I'd shy away from it. Things that only work on one service like that
>generate lots of extraneous bug reports ("Fire doesn't show 'user is typing'
>notifications for AIM buddies") and impossible feature requests ("I want to
>set my status to 'Eating a very large cheeseburger in paradise' on ICQ").
>It's a headache for us, confuses users, and lends falsely to the impression
>that Fire is half-baked.
Sorry, that I didn�t know. If this would not be possible with all
services you shouldnt implement it. Thats clear.
Sorry, I didnt know,
cu Martin
--
dont.wanna.tell
[ot]coder - hehe
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
