On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > I don't like the idea of having two standard user configuration files > at all, I'm afraid. I'd rather have only ~/.config/fish/fish than > both.
fair point. i agree. > Sorry, I'll try to be less humor impaired in the future. :-) lol, no worries :-) > There are just no non-silly cases where you > don't want your init files. > [ to be converted ] are you sure about no non-silly cases? what about someone sharing their homework on a network drive and having different versions of fish on either machine? > That said, the user actually needs to know of the new file locations, > so I would suggest that when the files are automatically moved, a > large verbose message explaining the new file locations is shown in > this special case. on debian it is a general no-no to muck around with users config files without their acknoledgement. since i am anticipating the change of course i won't be surprised about it so i won't complain to much, i am just concerned that there are other non-silly cases out there. (we may also just have a different understanding of what is non-silly) greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world -- pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
