HI

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Axel Liljencrantz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In other word, the infrastructure set in place here will make sure any
> configuration made by the user in config.fish will be ignored. The original
> idea behind these key bindings is that the user should specify their key
> bindings in a function, and then, whenever that function changes, fish will
> notice and all running shells will reload their keybindings. In other words:
> redefine stuff in one shell, and all shells are updated at once. Coolness.
>
> But this scheme obviously has major discoverability issues. :~/

Isn't this true of the other configurations that require function definition?
I noticed that such functions (fish_prompt, fish_title etc) shouldn't be
defined in config.fish, but within their own function files. Defining
functions inside config.fish seems to fail if launching fish from
an existing fish instance (e.g. if you use a multiplexer like screen/tmux)

This is not obvious from the documentation (maybe)

-- Leonard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Reply via email to