We completely agree that you should not have to convert back to the analog domain. That is why we and VAC do NOT do it.
;-). Go read some more. Bob ARRL SDR Working Group Chair Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. "Trample the slow .... Hurdle the dead" -----Original Message----- From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:18 PM To: Jerry Flanders Cc: Bob McGwier; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote: > At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote: >> <SNIP> >> >>> If there ever was a compelling reason to use VAC, I missed it. Given >>> its faults, why is VAC still being recommended? >> >> What else can replace it? > I bought a lifetime supply of these for less than I paid for VAC: http://www.mpja.com/prodinfo.asp?number=15666+CB I understand what you are saying Jerry but I must reject it for philosophical reasons. There is no valid reason to have to convert back to the analog domain to solve this problem. That is just Rube Goldberg. Yes, it may work but it is just ... wrong. And yes, I am using that approach for now but there has to be a way to fix this properly. -- 73 de Brian, WB6RQN Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
