David Megginson writes: > > Norman Vine wrote: > > > To sum up I think that the work that has been done to make the > > 'instruments' act like a C172 is fantastic but it SHOULD be an option > > and not 'the way' > > It should be not just an option but the default option, at least when > we're simulating a C172. Still, the property tree does make it easy > to do things different ways when you want to -- that was its > intention.
Yes thank you for finally making doable but it did take a lot of simulated aluminium just _raining_ out of the sky ... and a lot of rewriting code that just plainly ignored the the 'true' values that were there but enough cheers Norman _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
