On Friday 11 October 2002 12:41 am, Jon Berndt wrote: > On Friday 11 October 2002 12:15 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > Is this a side effect of no longer getting the C172 defaults? > > > >That sounds like a reasonable deduction. I'm checking the rest > >of the planes to see if we need to gas up. I noticed the yasim planes > >have thier own definition for fuel inside the <sim> node. > > Well, the JSBSim planes have fuel tanks that specify capacity and fullness. > We don't deliver planes with no fuel, far as I know. > > Jon >
Ya, I just said about that because when I started up all the available 310's and the dc3, only the yasim planes started up. Whats the deal with the x24b fuel wise? That's missing a <consumables> section as are the shuttle and x15 I'm also seeing that on most planes, nightlighting is non existant. Should we use the '172 electrical system as a default or what? _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
