Hi Erik, Erik Hofman schrieb am 28.06.2007 08:50: > Maik Justus wrote: > > That would be the best. But how to know, that 1.2 would work? It looks > > If version 1.2 still contains this bug it will be noticed rather quickly > and changing the test would be easy. > > ok, I will test for the 1.2 and use the OpenAL Doppler calculation if successful. >> like, if the OpenAL Doppler effect bugs are a never ending story. And >> they do not work correctly at Linux (at least not on every build). For a >> short while I thought it would be the best, to use always the own >> calculation. But then I learned, that some (all?) Linux versions of >> OpenAL report them self as version 1.1 (in the header file), but do >> limit the allowed pitch range of a sound, which is in contrary to the >> > > As I understand it implementations are free to limit the pitch range and > I know almost for sure that Creative implementations don't allow pitch > settings above 2.0 due to hardware limits. > Yes, the driver is allowed to clamp the pitch, but the allowed range to pass to OpenAL is (0.0f,any], therefore I wouldn't expect an error reported by alGetError(). But no problem, I just will ignore if alGetError() returns an error after setting the pitch value.
I will try to make a patch for all reported bugs (up to know). > Erik > > Maik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
