On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:37:18 -0500, Matthew wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Unfortunately, the GPL doesn't account for emotion.  For those who
> have met RMS, interpersonal relationships don't really fit...  Certain
> rights are gained, others are given up.
> 
> The best we can hope for is that they are interested in being a part
> of a community, the worst we should expect is that they add no value
> and sell it as a package.

..in this case I think we have an excellent opportunity to stand up 
for the GPL by "enforcing it", copyright law and criminal law. ;o)

> I don't believe that FG I structured in a way to be able to receive
> funds as an organization, and consequently we can only hope that they
> will be a good community member and sponsor and assist where they can.
> 
> If people want me to slueth around and find some more info and

..by all means go ahead. ;o)

> possibly reach out, please advise.

..here I'd like the copyright owners to weigh in, me, I recommend 
hiring a lawyer for this job, to make sure we get it _right_. ;o)

..given http://www.idbproductions.com/Products/ and
http://idbproductions.com/catalog/ this is _not_ just us, so I'd
have Harald Welte and the guys at http://gpl-violations.org/ 
weigh in with advice on how to proceed.  I cc this there.

..playing with dig, jwhois and a web browser and the 
names I find, it's _amazing_ how I get thrown back to: 
http://idbproductions.com/catalog/  ;o)

> Regards... Matthew
> 
> 
> On 11/20/08, Tatsuhiro Nishioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For clarifying my position, I don't care if they sell flightfear.
> > But I do care if that affects our project in either technically or
> > emotionally. According to some threads or posts in the list and the
> > forum, it seems that many developers and users do not like the
> > current situation.
> >
> > I guess the problem is they don't make any communication with us
> > including contribution. I do welcome some third parties sell
> > flightgear if they are friendly and hopefully make a contribution.
> > Needless to say they need to observe the GPL thingies.
> >
> > You can pack everything into either DVD or thumb drive and sell it
> > as long as it doesn't brake any legal issue.
> >
> > But... For me it's more on human relation issue. As long as they are
> > friendly and actively open to us, then we can collaborate and make
> > flightfear better from both open source and bussiness aspects.
> >
> > I think there is still much room in improving the usability,
> > functionality, and quality of flightgear. If marchants can collect
> > such needs and give some offers and feedback (preferably in
> > implementation, but just an idea is OK) to flightgear community,
> > that'll be super good.
> >
> > Look forward to seeing reply from them,
> >
> > Tat
> >
> > p.s.
> > Sorry for full quote. I'm writing on iPhone. this fun tool is
> > missing copy-past and cut-paste things.
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:16 AM, "Matthew Tippett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> One thing to be *very* careful of is assuming that flightgear has
> >> some absolute right to control what happens downstream.  If this
> >> company is honoring it's responsibilities under the GPL, there is
> >> nothing that the FG community can do to prevent it happening.
> >>
> >> The GPL enshrines those rights to the recipient, and by extension
> >> you give up the right of control as an author when you allow code
> >> to be distributed under the GPL.
> >>
> >> The main thing that the GPL prevents is 'flightsimpro' creating a
> >> flightsim that has unique features and linking it into the the main
> >> binary and preventing the release of that. But if the developer is
> >> keeping their stuff separate (say an advanced-clean room
> >> implementation of terrasync using different scenery, or a bridge
> >> to a different flight sim network), again they have done nothing
> >> wrong by the GPL (distribution of aggregations is a confusing
> >> area).
> >>
> >> Contact with this company would clarify most of this quickly.
> >>
> >> (A parasite isn't always violating the GPL - a lot of X and kernel
> >> developers call Ubuntu a parasite since they don't contribute a
> >> proportional amount upstream.)
> >>
> >> Regards... Matthew
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/20/08, Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> --- On Thu, 20/11/08, Curtis Olson wrote:
> >>>> Someone pointed out this site to me.  It probably falls into
> >>>> the category of just barely ok, but I thought I'd post the link
> >>>> here to get some more eyes on it.
> >>>>
> >>>>    http://flight-aviator.com/
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> One way to discourage this sort of thing would be to include
> >>> "www.flightgear.org" prominently in the startup screens, in the
> >>> same way that we include "initializing sub-systems",
> >>> "initializing scenery".
> >>>
> >>> Possibly with an added message along the lines of "Welcome to
> >>> FlightGear,
> >>> the free open source flight simulator."
> >>>
> >>> That would force the rip-off merchants to at least compile the
> >>> code, rather than simply replacing some .pngs!
> >>>
> >>> -Stuart
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> ---
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> >>> challenge
> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win
> >>> great
> >>> prizes
> >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
> >>> the world
> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> >>> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from my mobile device
> >>
> >> ---
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> >> challenge
> >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win
> >> great prizes
> >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
> >> the world
> >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> >> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> > challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin
> > SDK & win great prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
> > the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Flightgear-devel mailing list
> > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> >
> 


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to