On 02.09.2009, at 15:59, Jane wrote:

> On 2009-09-02, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) 
> <ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com 
> > wrote:
>>
>>>     OK, hope you all are ready for this..
>>>
>>>     This is a fresh checkout of 1.3.x and default FLTK build
>>>     on stock Snow Leopard 10.6 + stock Xcode tools
>>>     running on an intel mac mini:
>>
>> Yup - that looks a lot like what Chris Miller reported over in
>> fltk.general.
>>
>> If I may quote Father Jack at this point - Feck!
>>
>> I guess we need to see if a gcc-4.0/10.4u-SDK build still works (I
>> assume/hope it will..)
>>
>
> fltk 1.1.9 builds for me using the gcc-4.0 compiler that comes with  
> SL. :)
> i have used:
>
> ~/src/fltk-1.1.9$ ./configure CC=/Developer/usr/bin/gcc-4.0
> CXX=/Developer/usr/bin/g++-4.0 CFLAGS="-arch i386 -arch ppc
> -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -O3" CXXFLAGS="-arch i386 -arch ppc
> -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -O3" --enable-threads --enable-localjpeg
> --enable-localzlib --enable-localpng --enable-quartz --enable-gl=no

FWIW, I did not get that to compile from the command line. Tons of  
stuff missing again. I *did* get FLTK and all examples to compile from  
within Xcode with only a hand full of warnings. Not that that is any  
good, but at least I kind of saved an important project... .

> let me know if you need help to fix fltk for that 64 bit stuff,  
> assuming
> there are probably not many SL+fltk devs as of yet.

Yes, any help with getting FLTK away from the last remainders of  
Carbon is greatly appreciated.

Matthias

_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to