On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:40:17 -0700, you wrote:
>>Only if the new way obviously fails. Otherwise you are sitting there with a
>>very expensive scope looking at all the possibly critical signals on both
>>samples and making signal quality comparisons.
>No oscilloscope is as expensive as is my time, and this would be true for
>most PC designers.
Damn you must be expensive, a 2G bandwidth scope with probes comes in at
around (guessing) $30k, what is a week's rental on that? But you forget the
time of the engineer to drive it, to know where and what he was looking at
- or are you more expensive than him also ?
I still suggest the time spent testing the proposition is not worth the
time of the layout guy carrying on the same way (unless the findings carry
over to many new designs) - there needs to be some production cost saving
also.
Cheers, Terry.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
