Em Sun, 2012-11-18 às 23:39 -0600, meg ford escreveu: > Hi, > > > I hope it's slightly better handled than Emily last 2 posts, > which > managed to say that the removal of fallback was badly > communicated (!) > without details of what was done wrong, > > > I think it would have made a hell of a lot more sense to announce that > there were significant improvements made to llvm pipe, and then > explain that we were planning to drop fallback mode. That way we would > have given credit to ourselves as a community for thinking about how > users would be effected by the change, and then we could have gone on > to explain why the change was necessary.
As is available on the page referenced in every communication about the removal of fallback? https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features/DropOrFixFallbackMode If people skip reading it intentionally, they'll only see the headline and make their (uninformed) comments. This is pretty much what happened. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
