On 26 Dec, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:22:59AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>> If you feel I've given the wrong impression, fine. Just say that, and
>> I'll clear up that I'm not saying it is intentionally done if that is
>> what people think. But admit to the lack of care of the past. What
>> happens after the next hardware failure? Who ever gets the box running
>> again, will be glad their work is done, and they will not email out a
>> notice.
>
> You are complaining to the wrong audience. Talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> not the FreeBSD user community.
>
I disagree with your statement.
>From what I'm reading, it seems that "the enforcement of policy"
has been lacking of that current policies need revamping.
If the former is the case, then the new SO has his work
cut out for him.
If the later is the case, then his complaint merits attention,
and immediate action. Mind you I'm not suggesting this
change. However, one of my counter-proposals to SSH
(to be given at the talk) is the "enforcement of policy".
And to wit, if said policy is weak, then the underlying structure
(or framework) should be expected of similar condition.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
