On Mon, 05 May 2014 16:46:24 +0200 LoneVVolf <lonew...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > i'd advise caution when using BR#2628, BR#2629 and BR#2630 . > While the data in them is correct, it only deals with a few cases.
I understand that the data there is incomplete, but what was there was at least sufficient to confirm the main point that the resource calculation varies considerably with the goods type produced. > Maybe it would be better to close them, and make a new feature request > under > 'Pending Features for FreeCol 1' that links to the wiki page above ? Fair enough, I will close them, and edit the existing PF#51 to point to the wiki. Cheers, Mike Pope
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
