> The other alternative would be to ditch C altogether and go with ASM 
> (since I *know* there's assemblers that fit the bill), but it's way too
> late to do THAT, and I don't think anyone who has the capability to do so
> is bothered enough to go that far (though to be fair, if someone WERE to
> try to create a free DOS clone - even just the rudiments like the kernel
> and command.com and such - completely in ASM and try to make it 
> functionally equivalent in those parts to at least MS-DOS 3.3, I'd offer
> any support I could to such a project, since I've wanted to do a "trim
> the fat" DOS clone for years and years).

you could help Christian to bring RxDOS into a usable state (and
report how much fat this saves with how much work)
good luck though, as I don't expect this to ever happen.
just surprise me ;)

http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/board_entry.php?id=15165

Tom


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to