> The point is that the best defense against this is an "I'm Sparticus"
> approach, where Freenet is widely deployed, and used for a diverse range of
> things. In a totalitarian state this makes it too expensive to try to
> shut-down all Freenet nodes, particularly when most of the network resides
> outside your jurisdiction anyway. In the case of pseudo-totalitarian states
> such as the US under the DMCA, it is more of a PR question as to whether
> people can have their internet access removed for such a dubious reason as
> using a Freenet node. Note that in both cases, we need more Freenet nodes out
> in the open, all of them equal, and your proposal works against that.
I suppose that's the fundamental point of disagreement. I don't think that
people will run nodes if node runners are being persecuted and have
no way to protect themselves.
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
