hmmm, I guess the ribbons should override the aseg w.r.t. cerebellum label 
as well.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Kim, Miyoung wrote:

> Hi, Doug.
>
> It is the output after autorecon3 (so yes, aparc+aseg.mgz).....
>
> I found another situation similar to this (different subject) - see attached. 
>  It seems like it might be occurring more frequently than I had suspected 
> earlier.
>
>
> Miyoung
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
> [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:16 PM
> To: Kim, Miyoung
> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] editing aseg.mgz?
>
> Does it look that way on the aparc+aseg.mgz?
>
> Kim, Miyoung wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I wasn't sure if my previous email (below) went through - essentially we 
>> have a cortical occipital area that Freesurfer, upon segmentation, labels it 
>> as cerebellum even though the pial surface appears to have been outlined 
>> correctly (happened twice on the same data!) - I was under the impression 
>> from the responses that the parcellation is performed using the surfaces so 
>> I went ahead to recon3 - unfortunately that part of the cortex is still 
>> labeled as cerebellum (see attached).
>>
>> One of my colleagues told me that she saw instances where the pial surface 
>> would cut into the cerebellum - can editing the aseg.mgz fix both issues?  
>> If so would you please direct me to the place on the Wiki page that details 
>> this process (sorry - I wasn't able to find it)?  Thanks much in advance!!
>>
>>
>> Miyoung
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kim, Miyoung
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:16 PM
>> To: 'Bruce Fischl'
>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] (no subject)
>>
>> Hi, Bruce.
>>
>> Thanks for your reply - it appears that this has happened before (though I'm 
>> not exactly certain how often) and we suspect it could happen again in the 
>> future.  You mentioned editing the aseg.mgz - would you point us to the 
>> place on the Wiki page that details how this is done and also, can the 
>> editing be accomplished without compromising the global GM/cerebellar/etc. 
>> volumes significantly?  Please let us know what you think.  Thanks in 
>> advance!!
>>
>>
>> Miyoung
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 7:28 PM
>> To: Kim, Miyoung
>> Cc: Allison Stevens; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject)
>>
>> Hi Miyoung,
>>
>> you can always edit the aseg.mgz if you want. Do you find this happens
>> frequently? That hasn't been our experience.
>> Bruce
>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Kim,
>> Miyoung wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Thank you Allison and Bruce for your feedback!
>>>
>>> Some follow-up questions if I may - are the volumes for the gray matter and 
>>> the cerebellum as indicated in the aseg stats file reliable and thus usable 
>>> (e.g. can we use the GM volume in the file if it's labeled as 
>>> cerebellum/use the cerebellum volume if it's labeled as GM)?  If not how 
>>> should we rectify this, and at which point must that be done (I've already 
>>> gone ahead and begun recon3 without editing - can this be fixed 
>>> post-recon3?)?  Please let me know what you think.
>>>
>>> Thank you once again in advance - Happy Labor Day weekend!
>>>
>>>
>>> Miyoung
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Allison Stevens [mailto:astev...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>>> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:06 PM
>>> To: Kim, Miyoung
>>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject)
>>>
>>> The parcellation is created using the surfaces and a cortical atlas so you
>>> shouldn't have to worry about the subcortical segmentation overlabeling
>>> like that. Take a look at the aparc+aseg.mgz in tkmedit.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Kim, Miyoung wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> Just a quick question - is cortical parcellation performed based on the 
>>>> pial line (red line) or the cortical segmentation (brown shade)?  The 
>>>> reason for this question is that after recon2 we have an area in the lower 
>>>> occipital cortical region that is shaded as "cerebellum" (see attached) 
>>>> although the pial line seems to have correctly outlined it.  Is this a 
>>>> potential problem that we need to fix and if so what should we do?  Thanks 
>>>> for your help in advance!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Miyoung
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for 
>>>> the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
>>>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
>>>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
>>>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be 
>>>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
>>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 
>>>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions 
>>>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
>>>> transmission.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
>>> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
>>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
>>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
>>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be 
>>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 
>>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions 
>>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
>>> transmission.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
>> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
>> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
>> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
>> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
>> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
> surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender 
> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to