Hi Doug 

sorry to nudge - any thoughts on lta tweaking? 

cheers,
Fred


On 30 Apr 2013, at 16:44, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Hi Fred,
> 
> I'll have to defer to Doug on this
> Bruce
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Fred Dick wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> On 30 Apr 2013, at 13:36, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Fred
>>> 
>>> I know it's a silly question but are you sure that file exists and is 
>>> readable by you? The fact that it's calling GCAread means it's doing the 
>>> right thing and support gca files.
>> 
>> Totally not a silly question. With tkregister tho it looks like the path to 
>> gca is hard coded somewhere (but not in tkregister.tcl). So after finally 
>> engaging my brain  I realized I could just make a symlink to the path 
>> tkregister is looking for  (e.g., 
>> /usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca) and then 
>> it works.
>> 
>> So that's great - and then if I use an --ltaout flag, tkregister helpfully 
>> writes out the .lta. Which mysteriously is different than the original 
>> talairach.lta.
>> 
>> Is it the inverse transform with an offset, perhaps?
>> 
>> The reason I ask is that it looks like you can tweak non-ideal .lta with 
>> tkregister. I think Matt Glasser wrote something related a while back, but 
>> not sure.
>> 
>> Thanks as always,
>> 
>> Fred
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> You can also extra the mean of the highest prob label (-nth 0) and the 
>>> label itself (-nth 1) using mri_convert:
>>> 
>>> mri_convert -nth 0 \
>>> /usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca \
>>> label_means.mgz
>>> 
>>> mri_convert -nth 1 \
>>> /usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca \
>>> labels.mgz
>>> 
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> Bruce
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Fred Dick wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi again
>>>> 
>>>> different weighting sorta kinda worked better. It might be a dud brain.
>>>> 
>>>> But on this topic - I realized I wasn't quite sure of a couple of things, 
>>>> and had some errors pop up with some tkregister2 options.
>>>> 
>>>> [btw, running stable 5.2.0 on snow leopard]
>>>> 
>>>> 1) I first tried to check the reg to the gca, and got the following error 
>>>> message. It looks like maybe this is an old/deprecated option given the 
>>>> hard-coded path to the 5.0.0 linux version (I saw a posting from Doug from 
>>>> a few years ago on this)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [rancate:/Applications/freesurfer/subjects] fred% tkregister2 --check-reg 
>>>> --gca dancar
>>>> tkregister_tcl /Applications/freesurfer/tktools/tkregister2.tcl
>>>> INFO: LTA input is not RAS to RAS...converting...
>>>> target  volume /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/dancar/mri/T1.mgz
>>>> movable 
>>>> volume/usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca
>>>> reg file       /tmp/reg.tmp.1367946635.dat
>>>> LoadVol        1
>>>> ZeroCRAS       0
>>>> $Id: tkregister2.c,v 1.121.2.1 2011/03/28 20:25:16 greve Exp $
>>>> Diagnostic Level -1
>>>> GCAread(/usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca):
>>>>  could not open file
>>>> No such file or directory
>>>> ERROR: could not read 
>>>> /usr/local/freesurfer-5.0.0-cent4-64/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca as 22
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 2) I also tried to load up the gca in tkmedit using the appropriate gui 
>>>> option, but nothing happened (no error messages either)
>>>> 
>>>> 3) Then tried another trick that Doug suggested a while ago on the message 
>>>> boards:
>>>> 
>>>> tkregister2 --mov $FREESURFER_HOME/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca --targ 
>>>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/dancar/mri/brain.mgz --lta-inv 
>>>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/dancar/mri/transforms/talairach.lta --check-reg
>>>> 
>>>> and got "ERROR: Option --lta-inv unknown"
>>>> 
>>>> 4) I finally tried using the talairach.lta as a transform to the fsl 
>>>> target, using some old default-processed brains to make sure it was 
>>>> correct-ish:
>>>> 
>>>> tkregister2 --check-reg --lta transforms/talairach.lta --mov ./T1.mgz 
>>>> --fsl-targ
>>>> 
>>>> This seemed in the ballpark - except when I looked at bert, who I assumed 
>>>> would be canonical, and transform was clearly not correct. (Given Doug's 
>>>> earlier command, it seemed like talairach.lta was the inverse transform of 
>>>> what I thought it was, e.g., sub => standard).
>>>> 
>>>> So I'm slightly stymied.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks tons,
>>>> 
>>>> Fred
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 29 Apr 2013, at 15:06, Fred Dick <ubjt...@mail.bbk.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Aha, I shall quickly try with the non -w weighting and see what happens. 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> On 29 Apr 2013, at 15:05, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> yes, the -w will create an optimal weighting to maximize gray/white 
>>>>>> contrast. The image it generates won't in general be physically 
>>>>>> realizable in an real MR acquisition. Not surprising that the tal stuff 
>>>>>> fails
>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Fred Dick wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Bruce
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm using TR=20, flip=30, TE=5 - but possibly irrelevant as also have 
>>>>>>> the -w flag on.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I originally thought this was from a bad brainmask, but then generated 
>>>>>>> a good one and same thing happening.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 29 Apr 2013, at 14:27, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Fred
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> we don't have much experience with this. Which synthesis are you 
>>>>>>>> using? You might need to use a different one for the talairaching to 
>>>>>>>> more closely match the atlas (maybe a TR=20,TE=2.5,flip=20-30 one)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Fred Dick wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'm having difficulties getting correct Talairach.lta's from 
>>>>>>>>> synthetic flash volumes (Bruce, you are probably sorry you ever told 
>>>>>>>>> me about this!).  Basically the brain is over-scaled (bigger than it 
>>>>>>>>> should be), which I think is happening because the contrast is so 
>>>>>>>>> good (gm much darker than wm).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Is there an example of how to use the -flash_parms flag, and what 
>>>>>>>>> mri_em_register is expecting in the parameter file?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Fred
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom 
>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>>>>>>>> HelpLine at
>>>>>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you 
>>>>>>>> in error
>>>>>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender 
>>>>>>>> and properly
>>>>>>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to