Hi Panos

no, mris_anatomical_stats won't do it. I would map the average thickness 
to fsaverage coords, then load that into matlab and go from there using 
the [xyz] coords of fsaverage for the binning, which is pretty much 
MNI305

cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 13 May 2014, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
>
> Sorry, I had a last follow up question. I just realized that the resulting
> bins will be in the fsaverage space, and hence I wouldn't be able to use
> mris_anatomical_stats to calculate the average thickness of the bins,
> since the fsaverage "subject" does not have a wm.mgz file. Did you have
> another way in mind to calculate the thickness of each bin, or do you
> believe that mris_anatomical stats should do the trick with a specific
> flag?
>
> Thanks a ton,
> Panos
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> I see, that's really helpful, thank you!
>>
>> Best,
>> Panos
>>
>>
>>> Hi Panos
>>>
>>> I would make an average thickness map in fsaverage space, then in matlab
>>> divvy up the a-p direction into bins (say 100 of them) and compute the
>>> average in each bin based on the a/p coordinate
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> Bruce
>>> On Tue, 13 May 2014,
>>> pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> Just to clarify, when you say "average the thickness along each A/P
>>>> coordinate" do you mean by looking up at the average cortical thickness
>>>> of
>>>> each parcellation and then calculating their average from P->A, or is
>>>> there another way to find the average thickness of each slice and then
>>>> see
>>>> how that average changes from P->A?
>>>> Thanks again for your time,
>>>> Panos
>>>>
>>>>> I see. Then measure the thickness normally, then see how it changes in
>>>>> those directions. You could average the thickness along each A/P
>>>>> coordinate
>>>>> - that wouldn't be a problem. You just don't want to measure it that
>>>>> way
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2014,
>>>>> pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your reply. I was interested in looking how the
>>>>>> thickness
>>>>>> changes from the posterior to the anterior side of the brain and vice
>>>>>> versa (the thickness gradient).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you again for your time!
>>>>>> Panos
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Panos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it would certainly be possible to make that measurement, but it
>>>>>>> wouldn't
>>>>>>> tell you anything biologically interesting. Why would you want to do
>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> thing? It will reflect the (arbitrary) image slice orientation and
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> brain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2014, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi FS experts,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was wondering whether it would be possible to measure the average
>>>>>>>> cortical thickness at a specific slice (either axial, coronal, or
>>>>>>>> sagittal). I read in Bruce's paper: "Measuring the thickness of the
>>>>>>>> human
>>>>>>>> cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images" that "Measuring the
>>>>>>>> thickness from the coronal slice at the point indicated by the
>>>>>>>> green
>>>>>>>> cross
>>>>>>>> would result in an estimate in excess of 1 cm." Is that always the
>>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>>> or has there been a way to bypass that issue?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for your time,
>>>>>>>> Panos
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to