no, for all surfaces for the same hemi (lh and rh). lh.inflated.K is not a surface - it's a scalar field over the surface. The ones that should be the same are:

lh.inflated
lh.white
lh.pial
lh.orig
lh.sphere
lh.sphere.reg



and same for the rh (but different from the lh ones)

cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Ji Won Bang wrote:

Dear. Bruce.

Thanks for your help.

When I tried:
mris_euler_number rh.inflated.K

It gave me:
nquads=15728644,  nvertices=574
ERROR: MRISread: file 'rh.inflated.K' has many more faces than vertices!
Probably trying to use a scalar data file as a surface!

When I tried:
mris_euler_number lh.inflated

It gave me:
euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 144977 - 434925 + 289950 = 2 --> 0 holes
      F =2V-4:          289950 = 289954-4 (0)
      2E=3F:            869850 = 869850 (0)

When I tried:
mris_euler_number rh.inflated

It gave me:
euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 147184 - 441546 + 294364 = 2 --> 0 holes
      F =2V-4:          294364 = 294368-4 (0)
      2E=3F:            883092 = 883092 (0)

So if everything is correct, I should see the same numbers for all surfaces, but
since it's not the case, I should run recon again...

Thanks,
Ji Won

2016-03-22 12:24 GMT-04:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
      you can try recon-all -make all for that subject and and see if it doesn
      anything. But run mris_euler_number on those surfaces and see if they
      match. They should all have the same number of faces/edges/vertices (for
      one hemisphere in the same subject)

      On Tue, 22 Mar 2016,
      Ji Won Bang wrote:

      > Dear. Bruce.
      >
      > Thank you for your advice.
      > I think I misunderstood what you meant.
      >
      > What I did is this.
      > I showed the contrast result on a surface by using the command:
      > tksurfer-sess -s $SUBJECT -df sessdirfile -hemi lh -analysis retino
      -contrast HorVer
      >
      > Then I cut line, and then plane (occipital plane) and save it(3d) as
      lh.oc.patch.3d
      > under $SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf/
      >
      > I'm not sure if I regenerated the surface files correctly but I believe
      I created the
      > surface($SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf directory) from recon-all process.
      >
      >
      > Should I do something else to regenerate the surface?
      >
      > Thank you.
      >
      > Best,
      > Ji Won
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > 2016-03-22 11:39 GMT-04:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
      >       what surface did you recut it from? Can you run mris_euler_number
      on that
      >       surface (presumably the inflated) and also on the white/orig/pial
      >       surfaces? They should all have the same number of vertices, but I
      suspect
      >       some of them won't, meaning that they need to be regenerated.
      >
      >       cheers
      >       Bruce
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >       On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Ji Won Bang wrote:
      >
      >       > Dear. Freesurfer experts.
      >       >
      >       > Hi. How are you?
      >       >
      >       > I'm trying to flatten the visual cortex using the command
      mris_flatten
      >       (freesurfer
      >       > version 5.3.0).
      >       >
      >       > The command line is:
      >       > mris_flatten -w 0 -distances 12 7
      >       $SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf/lh.oc.patch.3d
      >       > $SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJECT/surf/lh.oc.patch.flat
      >       >
      >       > The error I get is:
      >       > using write iterations = 0
      >       > sampling 7 neighbors out to a distance of 12 mm
      >       > reading patch
      >       /home/jbang/Projects/replay/mri//replay06/surf/rh.oc.patch.3d
      with
      >       > 27964 vertices (19.0% of total)
      >       > MRISreadPatch: bad vertex # (147220) found in patch file
      >       > No such file or directory
      >       >
      >       > Previously, Bruce advised me to recut it, so I deleted the
      >       lh.oc.patch.3d and recut
      >       > it. However, freesurfer gives me the same error message...
      >       >
      >       > Could you please help me fix it?
      >       >
      >       > Thank you so much.
      >       >
      >       > Best,
      >       > Ji Won
      >       >
      >       >
      > _______________________________________________
      > Freesurfer mailing list
      > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >
      >
      > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
      it is
      > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
      e-mail
      > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
      HelpLine
      > at
      > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
      in error
      > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
      > properly
      > dispose of the e-mail.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      _______________________________________________
      Freesurfer mailing list
      Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to