External Email - Use Caution        

Thank you! Now I see how permutation works. So given about 100-200 subjects
in the normal group, doing 1000 permutations is of no help.

In fact, in my cortical thickness abnormality test, no matter how many
times of permutations I take, the original non-permutated data is the only
one arrangement I can observe that has a "big" cluster area - all
permutated data has no cluster of big continuous area (given the
vertex-wise threshold). So, permutations cannot give me a reasonable
probabulity distribution of the sampling data, which means I cannot rely
on it to reduce False Positives. Very frustrated here. If you have more
comments here, please let me know. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Xiao


Douglas N. Greve
<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=from:%22Douglas+N.+Greve%22>
 Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:27:47 -0700
<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=date:20200804>

There are actually only N-1 permutations that you can make:

Real matrix:
1 0
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1


Permutation 1:

0 1
1 0
0 1
0 1
0 1


Permutation 2:

0 1
0 1
1 0
0 1
0 1




On 8/4/2020 10:41 AM, Xiaojiang Yang wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Hi Doug,


I am still uncertain how to permutate the data for multiple comparisons.
Please help me with a little more details on this. For example, could you
give me 2-3 examples of the permutations for the matrix you gave to me?

In addition, if you can explain to me in a non-design-matrix way, that would
be great. For example, suppose I have 1 subject to be compared to n
subjects in a normal group. The number of comparisons is m. So I have m x
(1+n) data in total:

V_10                           V_11 , V_12 , V_13 , … V_1n

V_20                           V_21 , V_22 , V_23 , … V_2n

……                         …… …… ……

V_m0                          V_m1 , V_m2 , V_m3 , … V_mn

_


_Could you please explain to me how data should be permutated? Or give me
2-3 examples of the permutations of the above data that could be?

_Thank you a lot!

Xiao


Douglas N. Greve <
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=from:%22Douglas+N.+Greve%22
>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:54:17 -0700 <
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=date:20200723
>

You would have a design matrix with two columns and rows equal to n+1, eg
1  0
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
... n times
you would then permute the design matrix

On 7/23/2020 12:06 PM, Xiaojiang Yang wrote:

             External Email - Use Caution

    Hi Doug,

    For the first question, you answered "It is unusual, though it
    should work". Could you please briefly describe the way FS used to
    permute (based on my notation v0, v1, ... vn)? Or, the usual way
    to permute?The way I described seems to be the only way I can
    think of. Looking forward to your help here. Thanks a lot!

    Xiao

    Douglas N. Greve

<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=from:%22Douglas+N.+Greve%22>Thu,
    23 Jul 2020 07:37:13 -0700

<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu&q=date:20200723>


    On 7/21/2020 11:45 AM, Xiaojiang Yang wrote:

                  External Email - Use Caution

         Hi Doug,
         For your questions:

         1. "Not sure what you mean by in the ROI. Are you trying to
         permute across space? That generally does not work because the
         points are not exchangeable across space."

         By "In the ROI", I mean for all vertices listed in the label file.
Here, I
    am
         talking about a test subject and n control subjects, they are all
    considered in the same
         reference subject space - fsaverage. A ROI is defined by a label file
for
    the subject
         fsaverage. So, I am comparing the test subject and control group on the
    same ROI region,
         vertex by vertex. I want to permute points in the test subject and
points
    in all subjects
         in control groups.
         I am not talking about permuting vertex locations; I am talking about
    permuting
         values (thickness in my case) from subjects on each vertex. For
example, for
         vertex i, I have one value (v0) from test subject, and n values (v1,
    v2,...vn)
         from control subjects:
         test subject          control subjects
         v0                    v1, v2, ...... vn
         One way of permutation would be:
         test subject          control subjects
         v1                    v0, v2, ...... vn
         Is this a reasonable way to do permutation?

    It is unusual, though it should work.

         2. "Not sure. You cannot discriminate between the groups when you
         are doing permutation"

         By doing the permutation many (say 1000) times, I want to get the
    probability
         distribution of the sampling (observed or test) data inside the ROI
area, so
         that I can decide if I should reject or accept null hypothesis based on
         cluster-wise significance level. What problems do you think I have in
this
    idea?

    That should work. I'm not sure what my original concern was

         Thanks a lot!
         On 7/21/2020 1:12 AM, Xiaojiang Yang wrote:

                       External Email - Use Caution

              Dear FS experts,

              Instead of using mri_glmfit-sim, I am trying to implement a
              customized multiple comparison correction algorithm using
              permutation. Before I implement my own, I want to make sure my
              permutation idea is correct. So I was looking at how
              mri_glmfit-sim does the permutation. The link here

http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm has <
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm%C2%A0has
> <
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm%C2%A0has
>


<http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm%C2%A0has>


              a simple description for how to do permutation, but I don't quite
              understand the 1st step: Permute the design matrix. To me, permute
              the design matrix means permute the matrix rows here, but still
              hard to understand why permuting matrix rows does the trick.

         This is pretty standard in permutation. I think Tom Nichols has
         some basic tutorials on how permutations work.

              Anyway, I will not use any design matrix in my customized
              implementation, so it does not matter for now. My problem can be
              described as follows: if I have a ROI (a label file) on fsaverage,
              and I have a test subject and a group of control subjects whose
              thickness values on every vertex in this label are all known. (The
              test subject and control subjects are all using fsaverage
              reference space). I want to compare this test subject's thickness
              within the ROI to a control group of subjects (within the same
              ROI). This is a multiple-comparison problem, so I want to use
              permutation to get less FP rate. My question is: How do I permute
              the test subject's points and control subjects' points in ROI?

         Not sure what you mean by in the ROI. Are you trying to permute
         across space? That generally does not work because the points are
         not exchangeable across space.

              My understanding is that: for each point in the label, I randomly
              re-assign all (1+n) values from (1+n) subjects to these (n+1)
              subjects (where n is the number of subjects in control group). And
              when all points in the label are done, this is only 1 permutation.
              I will need at least 1000 times of permutation to get the
              comparison statistics.

              Is my understanding right?

         Not sure. You cannot discriminate between the groups when you are
         doing permutation

              Thank you!
              Xiao


         _______________________________________________
         Freesurfer mailing list
         Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


    _______________________________________________
    Freesurfer mailing list
    Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
    https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing
listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing
listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to