Thanks Bruce,

I would imagine keeping on the right side of the Defence and Strategic Goods List and Ham Radio regulations (or the local equivalent in any given country) would avoid any issues, and certainly the more dramatic scenarios you have alluded to.  I'll ask a few questions with my local authorities - they were very helpful last time.

I also feel we need to recognise the international nature of this project - and avoid being overly focused on US law.  Hopefully we can find a nice middle ground where we can all enjoy our hobby and keep our governments happy.

A code of conduct for Codec2/FreeDV and this mailing list is a good idea.  The participant policies document is a good start, but has a strong focus on gender issues and face-face behiavour.  We could probably get away with something shorter and more concise.

- David

On 19/12/20 6:40 am, Bruce Perens via Freetel-codec2 wrote:
Besides ITAR/EAR, looking at the treason laws in the USA, there is jail time for rendering aid to foreign military, and instructing in military activities requires your organization to be registered with the Attorney General (for careful watching).

I wrote participant policies for ORI about 2 years ago that IMO would have helped the mailing list with some social issues, not just export law. I think the Codec2 / DigitalVoice projects should edit out references to ORI and adopt them. See

https://www.openresearch.institute/developer-and-participant-policies/


_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to