Hi James,

Glad to see I'm not the only freevo user interested in capturing streams in a 
more user friendly way. Just as a sidebar to my previous email posted here a 
week ago, the Hauppauge HD PVR converts analog component HD video from a cable 
or satellite box to h.264 MP4 in a .m2ts container up to 1080i.From this 
device, a parser isn't needed and because it's taking analog component out from 
the box, it's not effected by any encryption, not even premium channels. A 
simple usb 2.0 cable passes the stream from the HD PVR to the computer where 
Freevo records it. A parser is still a great idea for those taking firewire out 
from a cable box. The downside to that is it will only pass unencrypted 
channels from the box. I might be the only Freevo user using this method of 
recording, but it's worked like a charm for nearly 2 years and I have a library 
of HD movies and concerts to show for it. I don't use Freevo to playback, since 
I a have a Boxee Box connected to my home
 network for playback to my TV. However, I can play anything it has recorded 
from Freevo on my computer using VLC, so I think i a VLC plugin for Freevo 2.0 
would be useful for playback through Freevo.

Phil


---- Original Message -----
From: James Trietsch <kero...@yahoo.com>
To: freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] The future of Freevo 2.0

I thought I'd chime in here too. I admit I haven't even tried any other 
HTPC packages out there. I went with Freevo from the start and have been 
using it ever since, from it's humble beginnings (in my hands) playing 
back video and audio in a beige box tower, to the TV-tuning, cable box 
controlling, radio streaming, podcast-playing powerhouse that it is now 
(and in a nice Antec HTPC case, too).

I do like the customization and plug-in architecture. It allows me to 
put in just the idlebar stuff I want, or if I'm not playing games I can 
take that out completely. I will admit I feel you need to be more 
knowledgeable to do the configuration... wading through the local_config 
file can be daunting at times. It will be nice when it's eventually an 
easy to use system of menus (either on-screen or via web).

And speaking of web, love the web interface. I use it almost exclusively 
for scheduling and keeping tabs on programs. Just last week I was over 
100 miles from home when I realized I'd forgotten to set a recording for 
the Formula One race. All I had to do was whip out my phone, call up the 
web page and set the recording. Piece of cake!

But the number one reason I love Freevo is because Python is not a 
terribly hard language to learn. If Freevo had been written in C/C++, I 
might have gotten enough motivation to contribute. But with it being in 
Python, it was easy to jump in and start twiddling and tweaking and see 
the results immediately, without any recompiling. The barrier to entry 
for anyone who wants to contribute or even just modify their local 
version is a lot lower, in my opinion. And that is good!

As for the future of it, I'm eager to see Freevo 2.0. Just listening to 
everyone talk about the plans in these last few e-mails has gotten me 
excited all over again. I don't know how much I can contribute just yet, 
but a few things sparked my interest:

* "Streaming" source - I don't know if I can help make it happen, but I 
vote for it. I haven't been dabbling in the direct-over-firewire 
recording I was working on before, mostly because I don't have the grunt 
to play back anything more than SD resolution and haven't found a good 
re-encoding solution/setting for what is recorded in HD. I should dust 
it off and give it some more work. But this leads me to...

* M2TS parser - Obviously goes hand-in-hand with the above, since the 
output from the cable box is a raw MPeg2 TS stream. I'd be willing to 
give it a look and see if I can make heads-or-tails out of the spec and 
how to adapt it to the metadata parser. I wouldn't count on me for 
this... but if I get some spare time I'd give it a try.

I had a few other issues with the direct-recording... but that's a 
discussion for another thread.

Regardless, I love the way things are looking.

James
Springfield, OR  USA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Freevo-users mailing list
Freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Freevo-users mailing list
Freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users

Reply via email to