Yes, I think how knowledge is recorded includes the machines that do the recording and the playback. For example, knowledge recorded on a magnetic tape is _not_ really knowledge if we don't have a tape player. Only when the tape is played can we call it knowledge.
Russ Abbott wrote at 04/22/2013 02:56 PM: > Do you consider how knowledge is recorded? In your view is there any way > to record knowledge other than in human (or other animal?) memory? > Perhaps a video is another possibility. What about a cartoon video? If > that's acceptable, what about the code that generates that cartoon > video? If that's ok, then suppose we can factor that code into the > (traditional) knowledge part and the part that converts the knowledge to > a presentation. You see where this is heading. -- =><= glen e. p. ropella But they won't tell us why ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
