> And to Ralf: > > I see your long discussions over past few years, so what's current > status? We still have a disagreement about texbreak, breqn, or > fricas native breaking domain?
I don't understand. I do not see a "fricas native breaking domains". That would be the task of the output formatter(s), but I don't think it was planned that breaking formulas should be inside the formatter. Well, it somehow is for the 2d-formatter ")set output algebra on", but that code is written in BOOT and I don't want to touch it. Breaking formulas in (La)TeX is a nontrivial task. breqn does it on the LaTeX level. texbreak, however, is a program that is pretty much tailored for the current TexFormatter in FriCAS. If tex.spad is changed (as I did to output LaTeX instead of TeX), texbreak becomes useless (or has to be changed accordingly). I didn't want to touch texbreak and rather outsource the task to breqn or mathjax, i.e., texbreak is dead for me. In fact, I don't know what to do wrt TeX, I haven't even tried whether TeXmacs showst integrate(sqrt(x^2+1)/(x^4+1), x) reasonably well. Nevertheless, my tex.spad can certainly be tailored easily just before a formula is formatted so that this formula gets a special treatment to show better. However, for general nice LaTeX output that breaks automatically like a human, I currently see no chance. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
