On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Brad Nicholes wrote:

> >>> On 11/6/2007 at 1:45 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias
> Blankenhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, john allspaw wrote:
> > 
> >> Hey all - 
> >> 
> >> While I love the idea of the python module, I'd like the plain-old gmetric 
> > binary to stay as-is. I'm not sure if there are/were plans on getting rid 
> > of 
> > it in favor of the new custom framework stuff. Some of the reasons why I 
> > think it should stay:
> >> 
> >> - Gmetric makes building custom metrics insanely easy. I tell people all 
> >> the 
> > time: "if you can make a number with any script you have, you can get it 
> > into 
> > ganglia, with whatever language you want." 
> >> 
> >> - We have a lot of custom metrics that depend on other software, (we take 
> > results from nagios checks and spit them into ganglia with the gmetric 
> > command, for example) and that can't be rewritten without a lot of work.
> >> 
> >> A huge part about why some folks where I work (Yahoo!) are interested in 
> > ganglia is that even with as basic install, you get a LOT
> >> of visibility into your systems and network, with very little effort. 
> >> Being 
> > able to embed a one-line gmetric command into any other monitoring they 
> > already have is the icing on the cake.
> >> 
> >> Thoughts ?
> > 
> > I also vote for keeping gmetric in the game.  I have asked this question 
> > before and I now sense a chance to reissue it :-).  Here is goes:
> > 
> > Is there general interest in extending gmetric so that it can take a list 
> > of metrics, instead of just one ?
> > 
> > We have a situation where we need to feed in lots of metrics and thus
> > suffer from the resulting system calls.
> > 
> > Another thought I had to further reduce system latency was to daemonize 
> > gmetric and let it read from a local socket or pipe or whatever peopel 
> > think is most convinient.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Matthias
> > 
> > 
> 
> The good news is that the gmond module interface (python or C) takes care of 
> those issues.  This isn't a reason to get rid of gmetric, just a reason to 
> consider moving your metrics to the module interface rather than enhancing 
> gmetric.
> 
Brad,

I would love to do that, except that with the latest Ganglia release 
version I believe I cannot yet do it.  Thus, I'll have to wait until
3.1.0 is out.  Until then, I still need a solution.


Matthias

> Brad
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to