Hi Rick:

On 11/14/07, Richard Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think that looks good.  I had actually debated whether the logic
> should go in the spec file or configure.in.  I ended up modifying the
> spec file because I was more familiar with it than with the autoconf
> stuff, but your patch seems less "hackish" than mine.

Thanks for your input -- I have checked this into SVN r874.  Will
release another snapshot shortly...

Cheers,

Bernard

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to