Steven Bosscher wrote: > Would it help to include in this "more information" to emphasize that > the issue is especially urgent for internals documentation?
I think I've expressed that reasonably well, with help from Jason Merill and Toon Moene. I gave examples involving both the internals manuals (e.g., target hooks) and the user manual (e.g., command-line options). I've not raised any of the Debian issues with RMS and don't intend to do so; I will not convince the FSF by making this into an argument about whether the GFDL is a good license. I'm trying to focus on use of the GPL'd code in GFDL manuals and vice versa, particularly in the context of GCC's manuals, as a way of reducing developer effort and improving the documentation. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
