Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> writes: > On 06/07/2010 11:16 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> Can you expand? What kinds of process changes would be reasonable to >> make? >> > Following the terminology "irregular contributor", per Jeff message, I > would not consider unreasonable for irregular contributions to use more > extensively and consistently the patch-queue, which we have been using > for some time. In that way all the patches would be perfectly tracked, > as far as I can see. The last days I have been traveling, thus sorry if > I missed parts of the discussion, but I don't understand why the > patch-queue mechanism is not being seriously considered...
The patch tracker (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_Patch_Tracking) is not currently operating. Would anybody like to volunteer to get it working again? Ian
