On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:13:22AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> I do not care very much but I disagree. Having some files with .c
> >> suffix and some with .cc suffix would imply some sort of difference
> >> where there is going to be none.
> >
> > Yeah -- this sort of discrepancy I don't like either. In gcc/, we
> > have 362 .c files and 0 .cc files, so every new .cc file will step out
> > of line... That might be pain for people who are used to do
> > 'grep foo gcc/*.c' and suchlike.
>
> Any issues with doing a mass rename then?
If various svn/git blame/log's would work, then I'm fine with it.
It's been discussed on gcc@ at some point; I don't remember any
major (dis)advantages.
Ok, I'll rename my new .c files to .cc.
Marek
