On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:51:35AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > > > I think it is a good idea now (except perhaps for the very few source files > > which could still be compiled by a plain C, not C++, compiler; maybe we > > don't have anymore them...). > > gcov-io.c is C code used for both host and target (one of the remaining > bits of target library source not moved out of the gcc/ directory because > of the complications of the dual way it's used), but it's used for the > host (and built as C++ when so used) via #include in other .c files rather > than being built directly. > > Various Ada runtime library files are also .c under gcc/ada - in general, > I'm not sure which .c files there are used as C, C++ or both, and which > are used for host, target or both; that would require careful > investigation for any renaming.
Ok. Then we could at leat rename to *.cc those files which are obviously directly using C++ features (e.g. the class or virtual C++ keywords). Maybe these files should before renaming have #ifndef __cplusplus #error should be compiled as C++ code #endif ?? Cheers -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
