John Doty wrote: > On Jun 28, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > >> At the risk of going OT, I'll add that as I get better at following >> the >> above strategy--- which is particularly helpful with more complex >> parts >> like microcontrollers--- I get really frustrated at gschem's strong >> association between pin numbers on the symbol, and pin numbers on the >> footprint. >> > > gEDA has no such strong association. It's a product of the way you > *use* gEDA. >
Oooh, please clarify! :) If there's an existing way to decouple pin numbers in symbols from pin numbers in footprints, such that I can get the Right Thing when merely switching footprints, I'd love to hear it. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff b...@billgatliff.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user