Dave N6NZ wrote: > > Agreed. I've felt that way since the beginning -- for the same reason > that you mentioned: changing package. For me, it's pretty annoying to > have to replace the schematic symbol to go from through-hole to surface > mount just because the pin numbers are different. > >
It just occurred to me that the problem is what a computer-science-type-guy would call one of "namespace". Symbol pin numbers and footprint pin numbers come from the same namespace in gaf's implementation. They shouldn't. That is all. :) b.g. -- Bill Gatliff b...@billgatliff.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user