On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 06:32 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:33:30PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> ... > >> Why not just free j-c to be a TLP if it wants to? > > > > Why would the board be inclined to create a *second* Commons project > > when the first one they created should be sufficient? > > The second one has well-known and widely used code and years of > established community?
And the Board would simply respond with something like, "well, why doesn't that community operate as part of the A-C TLP?" Look. Geir, Rodney: if you guys don't believe in A-C, then fine. You don't have to. But some others do, and it appears that some J-C components will move. Why is that so threatening? If you want to fix the oversight in J-C, then do so. Personally, I don't believe it is possible, for the reasons that Robert has already described. But I certainly won't stop you from trying. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
