On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Thanks for writing up a proposal Chris. > > NP. > >> >> I think it makes sense to have Common live in HDFS at least for now, >> since it's at the bottom of the stack / dependency chain and it's code >> is the most intertwined with common, and, per Arun, we tend to work on >> common stuff more than MR people. The HDFS project is really a lot >> more than HDFS, eg has all the hadoop commands, non-HDFS file system >> source, etc but that seems like an OK starting point. We need to >> figure out the committers and PMC though since the goal is to just >> have the HDFS community (vs the current Hadoop people) but the project >> will contain non-HDFS stuff. I'd like to hear from the current Hadoop >> committers and PMC members that mostly work on MR and YARN - are you >> guys OK losing your current privileges on the HDFS repo? > > Rather than ask the former question that way, I would just simply put up > a list of proposed HDFS PMC folks (yes, I keep using PMC ^_^). Then, > iterate on that. > >> Otherwise we >> haven't made much progress (ie HDFS still has multiple communities). > > ACK. > >> >> We also need to address the areas where it's not so cut and dry, eg >> where there is a single Hadoop project: >> - The Hadoop trademark, assume this lives in the HDFS project if Common does? > > Apache owns the Hadoop trademark, and the PMC helps to enforce it. Projects > don't own trademarks.
But which PMC does "the PMC" refer to though given that there is no longer a Hadoop PMC?
