On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 17:35, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >... >> Neither 1.6.6 nor the upcoming 1.6.7 are Apache-branded releases. The >> input that I received was that that was insufficient -- a branded >> release was necessary. > > I haven't seen that discussion, but unless you actually poll gene...@incubator > for an opinion, running the idea by a few of the more vocal participants
It was right here on gene...@incubator. Part of the "[PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion" thread. >... > What I'm looking to see personally is the execution of votes and signature > exchange happening on an apache list. That way the IPMC members can ensure > discussion is appropriate on both the private and public mailing lists > and the process is sound. I don't give a rat's ass how it is branded, and > assuming the code grant from the Subversion corporation is comprehensive > expect to vote +1 for graduation without an apache-branded release happening > prior to graduation. People will be more than willing to do a license > review on a non-apache branded release. Thanks, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
