On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 16:39, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 1:25:40 PM >> Subject: Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: >> [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion) >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> > Unfortunately, some documentation needs to be brought in sync. >> > >> > See: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#checklist >> >> I'm nitpicking, but even there we only ask the podlings to >> "demonstrate ability to create Apache releases". >> >> > Per Joe, I think it makes sense to run podlings through a release to >> > teach them the ropes, rather than lump that onto Infrastructure. But I >> > also believe we should provide waivers when appropriate. >> >> Fair enough. >> >> As an alternative, how about submitting >> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.6.tar.bz2 for >> IPMC review? That should require no extra work from and no special >> waivers for Subversion. > > I think Greg and company intend to cut another subversion release in > the next 2-3 weeks. If we can get some part of that carried out on > apache mailing lists, I think it would alleviate a lot of the initial > concerns.
Neither 1.6.6 nor the upcoming 1.6.7 are Apache-branded releases. The input that I received was that that was insufficient -- a branded release was necessary. I also pointed the IPMC at the three (primary) emails around the release of 1.6.6. Again, the input was "not good enough". So then I suggest a separate legal review, and request a wavier on making a release. Then the input is "ask us again later". *shrug* -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
