On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:38, ant elder wrote:

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That said, reminding people of the "release often and early" thing is
good to do,
but also have in mind that incubator releases are very difficult to
make.

Unlike Christian (another Wave mentor :-) ), I am generally in support
of this proposal. If a project cannot get a release out, then it
suggests insufficient weight behind it. Releasing software is what the ASF is about. It is acceptable that a mature ASF project, one that is code-complete, doesn't release regularly, but an incubator project would not fall into that camp, therefore being able to say "we can muster the
resources to make a 'legally valid release' within a year seems
eminently reasonable to me.


https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/an_apache_openoffice_timeline

In total, from entering incubation to first release was 11 months and
a week.  So this confirms that a year, for most projects should be
sufficient. But there could be exceptions, due to factors similar to
those I listed above.  But such exceptions should be rare.

Indeed the OOo was an impressive amount of work.

Reading comments from Upayavira and Rob, I am willing to support
the "relaxed" proposal of Roman. I would prefer mine, but
we can always do modifications as we see fit.

As it seems i was the only sceptic, we can try to formulate a patch
for our policies.



You aren't the only sceptic, i'm not enthusiastic about having such
specific policy about release time frames either. Some projects are just slow, having a deadline like that could just make them get a release out of
low quality without much care just to tick the box.

Looking at clutch these are the current podlings and age which are older
than a year and have no release:

Aurora         267
BatchEE     265
DeviceMap     904
Kalumet     1009
Ripple         617
Samza         330
Streams     582
Usergrid     265
Wave         1299

Maybe their mentors should just go have a conversation with them about it?

I can speak for Ripple already: there is a problem
and will need a solution soon (integration into Cordova, or moving out to GitHub).




 ...ant


---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to