On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 03:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:36 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> On 10/11/2015 03:34 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >>> > >>>> Am 11.10.2015 um 14:45 schrieb Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>: > >>>> > >>>> Producing good code is a community effort. When it comes down to just > >> the > >>>> mentors fix that themselves, there is something wrong with the > >> community of > >>>> the podling. > >>> > >>> I never questioned that. > >>> > >>> But the proposal sounds that a mentor _must not_ contribute to the > >> project itself but just mentor it. > >>> And I personally question if this is efficient and we would get enough > >> mentors in that case. > >> > >> The proposal was changed to address that concern. see > >> <56181303.7000...@apache.org> > >> > > > > And how does one access this? > > > > Sorry, I just posted the Message ID. It can be found on the > mail-archives or through our Pony Mail PoC site at > > https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/87bfb7d68294f0872f524b5418f5369a388b3128ff00d53b25df07f0@1444418307@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Sorry, I was hoping that the message id would provide some context as to what triggered the original email. FWIW I did try mail search, but didn't work. I'll kind of echo some of the sentiments here (as well as the note on the other list), but where is this coming from exactly? I've seen a gist with apache id's and numbers next to them. Is it a general feeling that graduating podlings are being too reliant on mentors post graduation? > > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
